State v. Evans, 21690 (7-13-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Evans, 21690 (7-13-2007)

2007 Ohio 3580

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 13, 2007

DocketNo. 21690.

StatusPublished

This text of 2007 Ohio 3580 (State v. Evans, 21690 (7-13-2007)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Evans, 21690 (7-13-2007), 2007 Ohio 3580 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION {¶ 1} Walter Evans, Jr. appeals from his conviction for purposeful murder, gross abuse of a corpse, and tampering with evidence. This is Evans' second appeal. He was initially sentenced to fifteen years to life on the murder charge and one year on the abuse of a corpse charge with the sentence of one year to run concurrently with the *Page 2 murder charge. Evans was also sentenced to a three-year sentence on the tampering charge, which was to be served consecutively to the other convictions. We reversed the first sentences imposed pursuant toState v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470. On remand, the trial court imposed the same sentences.

{¶ 2} Evans contends in his first assignment that he was again denied a jury trial when he was re-sentenced. We do not have a transcript of the re-sentencing, so we must presume the trial court merely used its discretion to impose the identical sentences previously entered. Evans' due process rights were not violated merely because the trial court reimposed the same sentences.

{¶ 3} In his second assignment, Evans contends the trial court erred in imposing court costs and fines when he is indigent. The trial court did not impose fines upon Evans. The court may impose court costs on an indigent defendant. State v. White, 103 Ohio St.3d 580, 2004-Ohio-5989,817 N.E.2d 393, at ¶ 8. Since no sentencing transcript was included in this appeal, we do not know whether Evans moved for a waiver of the imposition of those costs. The second assignment of error is Overruled.

{¶ 4} The judgment of the trial court is Affirmed.

FAIN and WALTERS, JJ., concur.

(Hon. Sumner E. Walters, retired from the Third Appellate District, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio) *Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION {¶ 1} Walter Evans, Jr. appeals from his conviction for purposeful murder, gross abuse of a corpse, and tampering with evidence. This is Evans' second appeal. He was initially sentenced to fifteen years to life on the murder charge and one year on the abuse of a corpse charge with the sentence of one year to run concurrently with the *Page 2 murder charge. Evans was also sentenced to a three-year sentence on the tampering charge, which was to be served consecutively to the other convictions. We reversed the first sentences imposed pursuant toState v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470. On remand, the trial court imposed the same sentences.