State v. Evanko

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Evanko

23 P.2d 340, 93 Mont. 609, 1932 Mont. LEXIS 18

Montana Supreme Court·Decided December 13, 1932·No. No. 6,966.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the attorney general that defendant’s appeal herein be dismissed, showing that while the transcript on appeal has been properly served and filed, no *610 brief has been filed as required by the Rules of Court; and further that defendant, having served one-half his sentence, has been admitted to parole and released from custody, is sustained and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

Mr. L. A. Foot, Attorney General, for the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the attorney general that defendant’s appeal herein be dismissed, showing that while the transcript on appeal has been properly served and filed, no *610 brief has been filed as required by the Rules of Court; and further that defendant, having served one-half his sentence, has been admitted to parole and released from custody, is sustained and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

Mr. L. A. Foot, Attorney General, for the State.

State v. Evanko, 23 P.2d 340, 93 Mont. 609, 1932 Mont. LEXIS 18 (Mo. 1932).

Pincite

23 P.2d 340 (State v. Evanko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.