State v. . Eubanks

139 S.E. 451, 194 N.C. 319, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 84
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 5, 1927·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Stacy, 0. J.

There is evidence on behalf of the State, from which the jury could and did find: (1) That on 4 October, 1926, the defendant, C. E. Eubanks, was the agent of the prosecutor, John Smith, and charged with the duty of selling, on the Greenville market, a load of tobacco and receiving the price therefor, the property of his principal; (2) that he did in fact receive such money amounting to $110; (3) that he received it in the course of his employment; and (4) that he intentionally and wrongfully converted it to his own use, knowing that it was not his own.

*320 Tbis evidence was sufficient to constitute tbe crime of embezzlement, bence tbe case was properly submitted to tbe jury. S. v. Gulledge, 173 N. C., 746; S. v. Long, 143 N. C., 674; S. v. Connor, 142 N. C., 708; S. v. Summers, 141 N. C., 843; S. v. Blackley, 138 N. C., 620.

Tbe motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made under C. S., 4643, was properly overruled.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Eubanks, 139 S.E. 451, 194 N.C. 319, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 84 (N.C. 1927).

139 S.E. 451 (State v. . Eubanks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Helsabeck
128 S.E.2d 205 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
State v. Block
97 S.E.2d 243 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
State v. . Ray
178 S.E. 224 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)