State v. Estes

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Estes

567 S.W.3d 696

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106333

StatusPublished

This text of 567 S.W.3d 696 (State v. Estes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Estes, 567 S.W.3d 696 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Keith Estes appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for felony possession of heroin and misdemeanor possession of paraphernalia with intent to use. There was no error in the exclusion of evidence, nor in the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Keith Estes appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for felony possession of heroin and misdemeanor possession of paraphernalia with intent to use. There was no error in the exclusion of evidence, nor in the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 S.W.3d 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-estes-moctapp-2019.