State v. Essary

Washington Supreme Court

State v. Essary

375 P.2d 486, 60 Wash. 2d 731, 1962 Wash. LEXIS 366

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 25, 1962

DocketNo. 36669

StatusPublished

This text of 375 P.2d 486 (State v. Essary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Essary, 375 P.2d 486, 60 Wash. 2d 731, 1962 Wash. LEXIS 366 (Wash. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The relator, by a writ of certiorari seeks review of a judgment dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. He was convicted on November 29, 1960, by C. R. Norris, a non-lawyer Justice of the Peace in King County, Washington, on a charge of driving a motor vehicle upon the highway of the state of Washington while his license was suspended. He was, among other penalties, sentenced to serve 180 days in jail, with 170 days suspended.

[732]*732The right to revoke the suspension without notice and without a hearing was not reserved in the judgment and sentence.

Thereafter in April 1962, the relator was charged in the Justice Court of C. R. Norris with driving a motor vehicle upon the highway of the state of Washington while his license was suspended. He obtained a change of venue on that charge from the court of C. R. Norris to the county seat. In July 1962, he was found guilty of the latter charge; and thereafter C. R. Norris revoked, without notice and without hearing, the suspended sentence and ordered that the relator be confined in the county jail to serve the remaining 170 days.

The relator contends that the court of C. R. Norris was without jurisdiction to revoke the suspended sentence, since it failed to expressly reserve in the judgment the right to revoke without notice and without a hearing.

The power of the Justice Court to suspend a jail sentence is clearly established under RCW 9.92.060. State ex rel. Graham, v. Willey, 168 Wash. 340, 12 P. (2d) 393. The statute provides that a jail sentence may be “suspended until otherwise ordered by such court.”

In State v. Davis, 56 Wn. (2d) 729, 355 P. (2d) 344, it was held that the suspended sentence may be revoked even though the period covered by the sentence has expired. This rule has been adhered to by this court in State ex rel. Pence v. Koch, 173 Wash. 420, 23 P. (2d) 884; State ex rel. Tingstad v. Starwich, 119 Wash. 561, 206 Pac. 29, 26 A. L. R. 393.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The relator, by a writ of certiorari seeks review of a judgment dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. He was convicted on November 29, 1960, by C. R. Norris, a non-lawyer Justice of the Peace in King County, Washington, on a charge of driving a motor vehicle upon the highway of the state of Washington while his license was suspended. He was, among other penalties, sentenced to serve 180 days in jail, with 170 days suspended.

[732]*732The right to revoke the suspension without notice and without a hearing was not reserved in the judgment and sentence.

Thereafter in April 1962, the relator was charged in the Justice Court of C. R. Norris with driving a motor vehicle upon the highway of the state of Washington while his license was suspended. He obtained a change of venue on that charge from the court of C. R. Norris to the county seat. In July 1962, he was found guilty of the latter charge; and thereafter C. R. Norris revoked, without notice and without hearing, the suspended sentence and ordered that the relator be confined in the county jail to serve the remaining 170 days.

The relator contends that the court of C. R. Norris was without jurisdiction to revoke the suspended sentence, since it failed to expressly reserve in the judgment the right to revoke without notice and without a hearing.

The power of the Justice Court to suspend a jail sentence is clearly established under RCW 9.92.060. State ex rel. Graham, v. Willey, 168 Wash. 340, 12 P. (2d) 393. The statute provides that a jail sentence may be “suspended until otherwise ordered by such court.”

In State v. Davis, 56 Wn. (2d) 729, 355 P. (2d) 344, it was held that the suspended sentence may be revoked even though the period covered by the sentence has expired. This rule has been adhered to by this court in State ex rel. Pence v. Koch, 173 Wash. 420, 23 P. (2d) 884; State ex rel. Tingstad v. Starwich, 119 Wash. 561, 206 Pac. 29, 26 A. L. R. 393.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 P.2d 486, 60 Wash. 2d 731, 1962 Wash. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-essary-wash-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack