State v. Espinoza

455 S.E.2d 857, 217 Ga. App. 314, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 1572, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 444
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Espinoza. Read the opinion of the Court — 212 Ga. App. 814
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 24, 1995·No. A93A1897·Published

Opinion

Beasley, Chief Judge.

In State v. Espinoza, 212 Ga. App. 814 (442 SE2d 911) (1994), a majority of this court reversed the trial court’s grant of Lorenzo Espinoza’s motion to suppress. That judgment was reversed by the Supreme Court “on the ground that police officers discovered the evidence within the curtilage of the defendant’s apartment for which they did not have a search warrant.” Espinoza v. State, 265 Ga. 171 (454 SE2d 765) (1995). Accordingly, this court’s original judgment is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is hereby made the judgment of this court.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., Birdsong, P. J., Pope, P. J., Andrews, Johnson, Blackburn, Smith and Ruffin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Espinoza, 455 S.E.2d 857, 217 Ga. App. 314, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 1572, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 444 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995).

455 S.E.2d 857 (State v. Espinoza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Espinoza v. State
454 S.E.2d 765 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1995)
State v. Espinoza
442 S.E.2d 911 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)