State v. Esperti

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Esperti

238 So. 2d 312

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 5, 1970

DocketNo. 69-689

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 238 So. 2d 312 (State v. Esperti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Esperti, 238 So. 2d 312 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner files this timely petition for writ of certiorari to review an order of the trial court requiring the petitioner to disclose for an in camera inspection all evidence favorable to the respondent.

Respondent argues that common law certiorari is not the appropriate vehicle to review the order of the trial court. This contention was specifically rejected by this court in State v. Gillespie, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 550.

The record before the court conclusively shows that the respondent has satisfied the dictates of this court’s announced prerequisite for the entry of the order here reviewed. State v. Williams, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 253, and State v. Gillespie, supra.

Inasmuch as the respondent has laid the predicate required for the entry of an order compelling disclosure of all evidence favorable to him for an in camera inspection by the trial court, the petition for writ of certi-orari is

Denied.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner files this timely petition for writ of certiorari to review an order of the trial court requiring the petitioner to disclose for an in camera inspection all evidence favorable to the respondent.

Respondent argues that common law certiorari is not the appropriate vehicle to review the order of the trial court. This contention was specifically rejected by this court in State v. Gillespie, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 550.

The record before the court conclusively shows that the respondent has satisfied the dictates of this court’s announced prerequisite for the entry of the order here reviewed. State v. Williams, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 253, and State v. Gillespie, supra.

Inasmuch as the respondent has laid the predicate required for the entry of an order compelling disclosure of all evidence favorable to him for an in camera inspection by the trial court, the petition for writ of certi-orari is

Denied.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 So. 2d 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-esperti-fladistctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack