State v. Erum

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided November 1, 2016·No. SCWC-15-0000131·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000131 01-NOV-2016 02:35 PM

SCWC-15-0000131

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

THEODORICO ERUM, JR., Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000131; CASE NO. 5DCC-14-0000212)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant Theodorico Erum, Jr.’s application for writ of certiorari filed on September 22, 2016 is hereby accepted. Pursuant to the court’s reserved discretion, no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 1, 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Erum, (haw 2016).

State v. Erum (State v. Erum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.