State v. Erum
This text of State v. Erum (State v. Erum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000131 01-NOV-2016 02:35 PM SCWC-15-0000131
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
THEODORICO ERUM, JR., Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000131; CASE NO. 5DCC-14-0000212)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant Theodorico Erum, Jr.’s application for writ of certiorari filed on September 22, 2016 is hereby accepted. Pursuant to the court’s reserved discretion, no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 1, 2016.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Erum, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-erum-haw-2016.