State v. Eros Cinema, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Eros Cinema, Inc.

259 So. 2d 912, 261 La. 456, 1972 La. LEXIS 5242

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 6, 1972

DocketNo. 52302

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 259 So. 2d 912 (State v. Eros Cinema, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Eros Cinema, Inc., 259 So. 2d 912, 261 La. 456, 1972 La. LEXIS 5242 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

(See order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

[458]*458It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Jerome M. Winsberg, Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 9th day of June, 1972, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(See order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

[458]*458It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Jerome M. Winsberg, Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 9th day of June, 1972, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 So. 2d 912, 261 La. 456, 1972 La. LEXIS 5242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-eros-cinema-inc-la-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack