State v. Eric M.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Eric M.

266 Conn. 917

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 1, 2003·No. SC 17074·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 91 (AC 22747), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to recuse itself from the sentencing of the defendant?”

Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 1, 2003

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 91 (AC 22747), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to recuse itself from the sentencing of the defendant?”

Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 1, 2003

State v. Eric M., 266 Conn. 917 (Colo. 2003).

Pincite

266 Conn. 917 (State v. Eric M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related