State v. Eric M.

266 Conn. 917
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 1, 2003
DocketSC 17074
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 Conn. 917 (State v. Eric M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Eric M., 266 Conn. 917 (Colo. 2003).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 91 (AC 22747), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to recuse itself from the sentencing of the defendant?”
Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 1, 2003

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. ERIC M.
858 A.2d 767 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 Conn. 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-eric-m-conn-2003.