State v. Ereth
This text of 153 Mont. 8 (State v. Ereth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DECISION
The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of four years, imposed on October 1968,- was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that:
(1) The sentence be and remain as originally imposed by the sentencing court.
The reason for the above decision is that the- sentence appears proper and sufficiently lenient in that defendant was convicted of first degree burglary punishable by not less .than 1 nor more than 15 years imprisonment, yet received a sentence of but 4 years with 24 days jail time credit after 2 violations of what originally was a 3 years deferred imposition of sentence, and will_ be eligible for parole consideration in July, 1969, after being received' October 15, 1968.
SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION
Philip C. Duncan, chairman; Paul G. Hatfield, Jack D. Shanstrom.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 Mont. 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ereth-mont-1969.