State v. Erby
This text of 323 S.W.3d 96 (State v. Erby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
DaJuan Erby appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of unlawful use of a weapon and resisting arrest. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not clearly erroneous. State v. Ross, 254 S.W.3d 267, 272-73 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
323 S.W.3d 96, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1402, 2010 WL 4075769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-erby-moctapp-2010.