State v. Erby

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Erby

323 S.W.3d 96, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1402, 2010 WL 4075769

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 2010·No. No. ED 93744·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

DaJuan Erby appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of unlawful use of a weapon and resisting arrest. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not clearly erroneous. State v. Ross, 254 S.W.3d 267, 272-73 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

DaJuan Erby appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of unlawful use of a weapon and resisting arrest. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not clearly erroneous. State v. Ross, 254 S.W.3d 267, 272-73 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Erby, 323 S.W.3d 96, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1402, 2010 WL 4075769 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

323 S.W.3d 96 (State v. Erby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related