State v. Enos

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Enos. Read the opinion of the Court — 465 P.3d 597
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 10, 2019·No. SCWC-18-0000407·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 10-OCT-2019 02:08 PM

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

FRANK ENOS,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CR. NO. 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Frank Enos’s application for writ of certiorari filed on August 26, 2019, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, October 10, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Enos, (haw 2019).

State v. Enos (State v. Enos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.