State v. Enk
This text of 348 Or. App. 20 (State v. Enk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
20 March 25, 2026 No. 228
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MADELINE MARIE ENK, Defendant-Appellant. Beaverton Municipal Court 2411023; A185457
Zohra Bakhtary Tourville, Judge. Submitted March 3, 2026. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and James Brewer, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant. Dan Rayfield, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Interim Deputy Attorney General, and Megan Mizuta, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, Powers, Judge, and O’Connor, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Avalos-Lezama, 346 Or App 604, ___ P3d ___ (2026).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
348 Or. App. 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-enk-orctapp-2026.