State v. England-Ray

335 Or. App. 458
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 9, 2024
DocketA180191
StatusUnpublished

This text of 335 Or. App. 458 (State v. England-Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. England-Ray, 335 Or. App. 458 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

458 October 9, 2024 No. 727

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TERESA DENELLE ENGLAND-RAY, Defendant-Appellant. Lane County Circuit Court 22CR07733; A180191

Erin A. Fennerty, Judge. Submitted on August 28, 2024. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Daniel C. Silberman, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jordan R. Silk, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, Mooney, Judge, and Pagán, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Thomas, 324 Or App 114, 524 P3d 969 (2023).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thomas (A173467)
524 P.3d 969 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
335 Or. App. 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-england-ray-orctapp-2024.