State v. Enerson

571 P.2d 921, 31 Or. App. 1023, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2106
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 5, 1977
DocketNo. 8722, CA 8589
StatusPublished

This text of 571 P.2d 921 (State v. Enerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Enerson, 571 P.2d 921, 31 Or. App. 1023, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2106 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant in this case appeals from a 1977 order revoking his probation and ordering him to serve the five-year sentence imposed in 1975 when the trial court had sentenced him to five years in prison, but suspended the execution of sentence and placed him on probation for a like period. The defendant concedes that revocation of probation was warranted, but argues that the five-year sentence was excessive and should be modified. Assuming, arguendo, that we have jurisdiction over the sentence, see State v. Goodin, 1 Or App 559, 465 P2d 487 (1970); State v. Gates, 230 Or 84, 368 P2d 605 (1962), we would not modify the sentence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Goodin
465 P.2d 487 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1970)
State v. Gates
368 P.2d 605 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
571 P.2d 921, 31 Or. App. 1023, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-enerson-orctapp-1977.