State v. Emry

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Emry

814 S.W.2d 1, 1991 WL 134251, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1147

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 23, 1991·No. No. WD 43007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appeal from conviction of two counts of carrying a concealed weapon, § 571.030, RSMo, and fines of $100 on each count. The case is remanded to the trial court for the nunc pro tunc correction of its written judgment. The judgment reads: “Court fines defendant on Count I and $100 on Count II.” The trial court on remand should insert the figure “$100” after the word “defendant.”

As amended, the judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appeal from conviction of two counts of carrying a concealed weapon, § 571.030, RSMo, and fines of $100 on each count. The case is remanded to the trial court for the nunc pro tunc correction of its written judgment. The judgment reads: “Court fines defendant on Count I and $100 on Count II.” The trial court on remand should insert the figure “$100” after the word “defendant.”

As amended, the judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Emry, 814 S.W.2d 1, 1991 WL 134251, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1147 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

814 S.W.2d 1 (State v. Emry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.