State v. Emily

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Emily

558 S.W.3d 100

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 14, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105780

StatusPublished

This text of 558 S.W.3d 100 (State v. Emily) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Emily, 558 S.W.3d 100 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*101Phillip Emily appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of receiving stolen property, in violation of Section 570.080, RSMo 2000,¹ for which he was sentenced as a persistent offender to fifteen-years' imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*101Phillip Emily appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of receiving stolen property, in violation of Section 570.080, RSMo 2000,¹ for which he was sentenced as a persistent offender to fifteen-years' imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

558 S.W.3d 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-emily-moctapp-2018.