Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Emerson

State v. Emerson

949 N.E.2d 43, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Emerson. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 Ohio St. 3d 191 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 22, 2011·No. 2011-0486·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 94413, 2011-Ohio-593. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. O’Donnell, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. Ill through VIII. Pfeifer, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Emerson, 949 N.E.2d 43, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556 (Ohio 2011).

949 N.E.2d 43 (State v. Emerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.