State v. Emerson
14 A.2d 378, 40 Del. 496, 1 Terry 496, 1940 Del. LEXIS 39
Opinion
: Our conclusion is that Ralph W. Emerson, Donald P. Ross and Charles D. Abbott have the clear legal right to hold and exercise the offices of members of the State Highway Department, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 173, Volume 42, Latos of Delaware. The same conclusion was reached by the Court Below, and all of the issues involved in the case were so thoroughly considered in the opinion filed by that Court that it seems unnecessary to add anything to what has already been said.
The judgment of the Court Below is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Emerson, 14 A.2d 378, 40 Del. 496, 1 Terry 496, 1940 Del. LEXIS 39 (Del. Ct. App. 1940).
14 A.2d 378 (State v. Emerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilmington Savings Fund Society v. Green
288 A.2d 273 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1972)
State v. Halko
193 A.2d 817 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1963)
State v. Schorr
131 A.2d 158 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1957)
State v. Shaw
126 A.2d 542 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1956)
State v. 0.62033 Acres of Land in Christiana Hundred
112 A.2d 857 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1955)
In Re Opinions of the Justices
88 A.2d 128 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1952)
Reese v. Hartnett
75 A.2d 266 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1950)
Reese v. Hartnett
73 A.2d 782 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1950)
State Ex Rel. James v. Schorr
65 A.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1948)
State v. Schorr
58 A.2d 421 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1948)