State v. Elrod

Supreme Court of Kansas

State v. Elrod

35 Kan. 639

DecidedJuly 15, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Kan. 639 (State v. Elrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Elrod, 35 Kan. 639 (kan 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

T. H. Elrod, defendant in error, made complaint under oath before Thomas J. Noble, a justice of the peace of Ellsworth county, charging William Bohrer with the offense of unlawfully disturbing the members of a religious society while meeting together for the purpose of worship. The defendant was tried before the justice of the peace, and the case was subsequently heard in the district court. • Judg-

[640]*640ment was rendered in that court relieving the complainant from costs. To review and reverse that decision, a petition in error has been filed in this court. No appeal has ever been taken from the district court to the supreme court, and as the case is not a civil action, it is not rightfully brought to this court, and the petition in error must therefore be dismissed. (Beisner v. The State, 19 Kas. 479; MeGilvray v. The State, 19 id. 481; MeLean v. The State, 28 id. 372.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

T. H. Elrod, defendant in error, made complaint under oath before Thomas J. Noble, a justice of the peace of Ellsworth county, charging William Bohrer with the offense of unlawfully disturbing the members of a religious society while meeting together for the purpose of worship. The defendant was tried before the justice of the peace, and the case was subsequently heard in the district court. • Judg-

[640]*640ment was rendered in that court relieving the complainant from costs. To review and reverse that decision, a petition in error has been filed in this court. No appeal has ever been taken from the district court to the supreme court, and as the case is not a civil action, it is not rightfully brought to this court, and the petition in error must therefore be dismissed. (Beisner v. The State, 19 Kas. 479; MeGilvray v. The State, 19 id. 481; MeLean v. The State, 28 id. 372.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Kan. 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-elrod-kan-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack