State v. Elmore

920 N.E.2d 370, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1439
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 27, 2010
Docket2004-0041 and 2007-0475
StatusPublished

This text of 920 N.E.2d 370 (State v. Elmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Elmore, 920 N.E.2d 370, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

Licking C.P. No. 02 CR 275. On motion to consolidate direct appeal case numbers. Motion denied. On application for reopening of case No. 2004-0041. Motion denied because appellant failed to comply with the 90-day filing deadline in S.Ct.Prac.R. 11.6(A). On application for reopening of ease No. 2007-0475 under S.Ct.Prac.R. 11.6. Motion denied.

Cupp, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 N.E.2d 370, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-elmore-ohio-2010.