State v. . Elmore

161 S.E. 926, 201 N.C. 842, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 144
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 23, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.E. 926 (State v. . Elmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Elmore, 161 S.E. 926, 201 N.C. 842, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 144 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging the defendant, and another, (1) with breaking and entering a garage, (2) with the larceny of "one Model T, 1927, Ford automobile," valued at $200, the property of E. O. Rickman, and (3) with receiving said automobile *Page 843 knowing it to have been feloniously stolen or taken in violation of C. S., 4250.

The case was submitted to the jury on the presumption that: "When goods are stolen, one found in possession so soon thereafter that he could not have reasonably got the possession unless he had stolen them himself, the law presumes he was the thief." S. v. Graves, 72 N.C. 482; S. v. McRae,120 N.C. 608, 27 S.E. 78.

Verdict: "Guilty on the third count in the bill of indictment."

Judgment: Eight months on the roads.

Defendant appeals, assigning errors. The case is controlled by the decision in S. v. Best, 202 N.C. 9, andS. v. Adams, 133 N.C. 667, 45 S.E. 553.

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . McRae
27 S.E. 78 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
State v. . Graves
72 N.C. 482 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1875)
State v. . Best
161 S.E. 535 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
State v. Adams.
45 S.E. 553 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 926, 201 N.C. 842, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-elmore-nc-1931.