State v. Ellis
809 A.2d 796, 174 N.J. 535, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1496
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Cianeia’s majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 346 N.J.Super. 583, 788 A.2d 849 (2002).
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and JUSTICES COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, and ALBIN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Ellis, 809 A.2d 796, 174 N.J. 535, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1496 (N.J. 2002).
809 A.2d 796 (State v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. TIM MCGEACHY (10-06-1064, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2019
State v. Locane
184 A.3d 495 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2018)
State v. Pierce
104 A.3d 1074 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2014)
State v. Acevedo
11 A.3d 858 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)
State v. Nasir
809 A.2d 796 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2002)