State v. Ellis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ellis

216 S.W.3d 226, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 354, 2007 WL 654390

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 6, 2007·No. No. WD 66675·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Timothy Sherrod Ellis (“Ellis”) appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, of first-degree robbery. Specifically, Ellis challenges the trial court’s ruling allowing his in-court identification by three prosecution witnesses. Ellis claims that those identifications were tainted by a previous photo line-up, which involved unnecessarily suggestive procedures, resulting in a substantial risk of misidentification. Because the issue raised in this appeal is not preserved for our review, and no plain error appears in the record, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written [227] opinion in this case. Rule 30.25(b). Mo. Court Rules (2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Timothy Sherrod Ellis (“Ellis”) appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, of first-degree robbery. Specifically, Ellis challenges the trial court’s ruling allowing his in-court identification by three prosecution witnesses. Ellis claims that those identifications were tainted by a previous photo line-up, which involved unnecessarily suggestive procedures, resulting in a substantial risk of misidentification. Because the issue raised in this appeal is not preserved for our review, and no plain error appears in the record, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written [227] opinion in this case. Rule 30.25(b). Mo. Court Rules (2006).

State v. Ellis, 216 S.W.3d 226, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 354, 2007 WL 654390 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

216 S.W.3d 226 (State v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.