State v. Ellis

486 A.2d 1191, 1985 Me. LEXIS 616
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJanuary 25, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 486 A.2d 1191 (State v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ellis, 486 A.2d 1191, 1985 Me. LEXIS 616 (Me. 1985).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Shawn Ellis appeals from his conviction in Superior Court, Aroostook County, of trafficking in a schedule X drug, in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103 (1983). Tried as an accomplice, Ellis contends that the State produced insufficient evidence of his specific intent to promote or facilitate the crime as required by 17-A M.R.S.A. § 57(3)(A) (1983).

Carefully reviewing the record in the light most favorable to the State, we are satisfied there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could reasonably have inferred Ellis’s intent. State v. Doody, 434 A.2d 523, 529-30 (Me.1981).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Doody
434 A.2d 523 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
486 A.2d 1191, 1985 Me. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ellis-me-1985.