State v. Ellis

132 So. 3d 1262, 2013 La.App. 4 Cir. 0834, 2014 WL 538786, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 42
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 8, 2014
DocketNo. 2013-KA-0834
StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 3d 1262 (State v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ellis, 132 So. 3d 1262, 2013 La.App. 4 Cir. 0834, 2014 WL 538786, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 42 (La. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

ROLAND L. BELSOME, Judge.

_JjThe defendant, Cardell Ellis, is seeking to have his conviction and sentence reversed on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt. The defendant was charged, convicted, and sentenced for home invasion of an apartment leased by his girlfriend’s mother. Previously on appeal, this Court, addressing the sufficiency of evidence, affirmed the conviction and remanded the matter solely for the imposition of a mandatory fine. See, State v. Ellis, 12-0540, p. 9 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/16/13), 109 So.3d 944, 950.

Subsequently, present counsel sought an out of time appeal, which was granted. As in his last appeal, the defendant now argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove that his entry was unauthorized, as he obtained an oral sublease and was paying rent to temporarily reside in the dwelling. In his prior appeal, this Court conducted a review under the Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), and found that though the defendant had prior consent to enter the apartment, the evidence was sufficient to prove that the defendant’s entry at the time of the incident was unauthorized. Since this Court |2has already fully addressed the assignment of error asserted here and the defendant has not asserted any error or deficiencies associated with the previous ruling, we need not address the issue again. See, State v. Winding, 00-0364, p. 5 (La.App. 4 Cir. 4/11/01), 787 So.2d 385, 389. Accordingly, the defendant’s out of time appeal is dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Ellis
109 So. 3d 944 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013)
State v. Winding
787 So. 2d 385 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 3d 1262, 2013 La.App. 4 Cir. 0834, 2014 WL 538786, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ellis-lactapp-2014.