State v. Ellis
This text of 649 A.2d 263 (State v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant concedes that the jury instruction issues that he raises have been resolved adversely to his claims by our Supreme Court.1 We are bound by those rulings. See Burton v. Planning Commission, 13 Conn. App. 400, 409, 536 A.2d 995 (1988), aff'd, 209 Conn. 609, 553 A.2d 161 (1989); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 309 n.5, 523 A.2d 891, cert. denied, 204 Conn. 805, 528 A.2d 1152 (1987).
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
649 A.2d 263, 36 Conn. App. 916, 1994 Conn. App. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ellis-connappct-1994.