State v. Ellis

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Ellis

649 A.2d 263, 36 Conn. App. 916, 1994 Conn. App. LEXIS 385

Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided October 18, 1994·No. 13386·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant concedes that the jury instruction issues that he raises have been resolved adversely to his claims by our Supreme Court.¹ We are bound by those rulings. See Burton v. Planning Commission, 13 Conn. App. 400, 409, 536 A.2d 995 (1988), aff'd, 209 Conn. 609, 553 A.2d 161 (1989); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 309 n.5, 523 A.2d 891, cert. denied, 204 Conn. 805, 528 A.2d 1152 (1987).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant concedes that the jury instruction issues that he raises have been resolved adversely to his claims by our Supreme Court.¹ We are bound by those rulings. See Burton v. Planning Commission, 13 Conn. App. 400, 409, 536 A.2d 995 (1988), aff'd, 209 Conn. 609, 553 A.2d 161 (1989); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 309 n.5, 523 A.2d 891, cert. denied, 204 Conn. 805, 528 A.2d 1152 (1987).

The judgment is affirmed.

State v. Ellis, 649 A.2d 263, 36 Conn. App. 916, 1994 Conn. App. LEXIS 385 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

649 A.2d 263 (State v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related