State v. Eller
This text of 124 S.E.2d 806 (State v. Eller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Attorney General concedes that there was not sufficient evidence of culpable negligence adduced in the trial below to warrant its submission to the jury.
We concur in the view of the Attorney General. The evidence fails to show an intentional violation of G.S. 20-146 or an unintentional violation of this statute, accompanied by such recklessness or irresponsible conduct, or heedless indifference to the rights and safety of others, as to import criminal responsibility. S. v. Hancock, 248 N.C. 432, 103 S.E. 2d 491; S. v. Roof, 255 N.C. 607, 122 S.E. 2d 363.
The judgment below is
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 S.E.2d 806, 256 N.C. 706, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-eller-nc-1962.