State v. Elder

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Elder

513 S.W.3d 358, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1308, 2016 WL 7387629

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103876

StatusPublished

This text of 513 S.W.3d 358 (State v. Elder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Elder, 513 S.W.3d 358, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1308, 2016 WL 7387629 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Aaron Elder appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to correct an alleged manifest injustice pursuant to Rule 29.07(d). Elder claimed that his attorney misinformed him that he did not have to register as a sex offender as a result of his 2010 guilty plea and failed to inform him altogether of the sex offender registration requirements, thereby making his plea involuntary and unknowing. The trial court denied Elder’s motion. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Aaron Elder appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to correct an alleged manifest injustice pursuant to Rule 29.07(d). Elder claimed that his attorney misinformed him that he did not have to register as a sex offender as a result of his 2010 guilty plea and failed to inform him altogether of the sex offender registration requirements, thereby making his plea involuntary and unknowing. The trial court denied Elder’s motion. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

513 S.W.3d 358, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1308, 2016 WL 7387629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-elder-moctapp-2016.