State v. Eisele

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Eisele

578 S.W.3d 862

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 30, 2019

DocketWD 81463

StatusPublished

This text of 578 S.W.3d 862 (State v. Eisele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Eisele, 578 S.W.3d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam *863Jeanne Eisele appeals her conviction for driving while intoxicated following a bench trial. She contends the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress and admitting all evidence obtained as a result of the traffic stop because the stop was an unconstitutional seizure. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam *863Jeanne Eisele appeals her conviction for driving while intoxicated following a bench trial. She contends the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress and admitting all evidence obtained as a result of the traffic stop because the stop was an unconstitutional seizure. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 S.W.3d 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-eisele-moctapp-2019.