State v. Eisele

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Eisele

578 S.W.3d 862

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 30, 2019·No. WD 81463·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam *863Jeanne Eisele appeals her conviction for driving while intoxicated following a bench trial. She contends the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress and admitting all evidence obtained as a result of the traffic stop because the stop was an unconstitutional seizure. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam *863Jeanne Eisele appeals her conviction for driving while intoxicated following a bench trial. She contends the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress and admitting all evidence obtained as a result of the traffic stop because the stop was an unconstitutional seizure. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

State v. Eisele, 578 S.W.3d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

578 S.W.3d 862 (State v. Eisele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.