State v. Efford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Efford

596 So. 2d 788, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3954, 1992 WL 69010

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 1992

DocketNo. 91-1161

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 596 So. 2d 788 (State v. Efford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Efford, 596 So. 2d 788, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3954, 1992 WL 69010 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the defendant Dazzette Efford’s confession of error which is well taken, we reverse the order withholding adjudication of guilt and placing the defendant on two-years probation which was imposed below, over the state’s objection, for the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, to wit: a firearm, § 784.-021(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989), because the mandatory minimum sentence for an aggravated assault when committed, as here, with a firearm is three-years imprisonment. § 775.087(2)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989); clearly, any sentence less than the mandatory minimum under the applicable statute, as here, is legally invalid. Because the defendant entered a plea of guilty to the offenses charged upon the condition that she be given two-years probation and a withhold of adjudication, the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to allow the defendant to withdraw her guilty plea to said charges and proceed to trial. See State v. Padron, 580 So.2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on the defendant Dazzette Efford’s confession of error which is well taken, we reverse the order withholding adjudication of guilt and placing the defendant on two-years probation which was imposed below, over the state’s objection, for the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, to wit: a firearm, § 784.-021(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989), because the mandatory minimum sentence for an aggravated assault when committed, as here, with a firearm is three-years imprisonment. § 775.087(2)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989); clearly, any sentence less than the mandatory minimum under the applicable statute, as here, is legally invalid. Because the defendant entered a plea of guilty to the offenses charged upon the condition that she be given two-years probation and a withhold of adjudication, the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to allow the defendant to withdraw her guilty plea to said charges and proceed to trial. See State v. Padron, 580 So.2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

596 So. 2d 788, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3954, 1992 WL 69010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-efford-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack