State v. Edwards

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Edwards

340 S.W.3d 305, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 509, 2011 WL 1530577

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 12, 2011

DocketED 94709

StatusPublished

This text of 340 S.W.3d 305 (State v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Edwards, 340 S.W.3d 305, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 509, 2011 WL 1530577 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Byron Edwards appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Byron Edwards appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2010).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 S.W.3d 305, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 509, 2011 WL 1530577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-edwards-moctapp-2011.