State v. Edwards

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Edwards

340 S.W.3d 305, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 509, 2011 WL 1530577

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Edwards. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 448 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 12, 2011·No. ED 94709·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Byron Edwards appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Byron Edwards appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2010).

State v. Edwards, 340 S.W.3d 305, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 509, 2011 WL 1530577 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

340 S.W.3d 305 (State v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.