State v. Edwards

242 S.W.3d 435, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1499, 2007 WL 3145930
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 30, 2007·No. ED 88779·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Edwards appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of child molestation in the second degree. We find that Edwards has failed to show he was prejudiced by the trial court’s ruling granting the State’s motion to strike a juror for cause. We also find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in submitting the “hammer instruction” to the jury.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Edwards, 242 S.W.3d 435, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1499, 2007 WL 3145930 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

242 S.W.3d 435 (State v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Blanchard
242 S.W.3d 435 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)