State v. Edwards
290 S.E.2d 362, 162 Ga. App. 291, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2142
Opinion
The appellee in the above cases filed a motion in the trial court demanding a “trial by jury” identical to the motion filed in State v. Adamczyk, 162 Ga. App. 288 (290 SE2d 149) (1982). The wording of such motion does not constitute a demand for trial under Code § 27-1901.
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s judgment of acquittal.
Judgments reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Edwards, 290 S.E.2d 362, 162 Ga. App. 291, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2142 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).
290 S.E.2d 362 (State v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dickerson v. State
322 S.E.2d 502 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)