State v. Edwards

622 So. 2d 141, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8197, 1993 WL 291796
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Edwards. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5364
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 6, 1993·No. No. 91-1972·Published

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

This matter comes to the court as an appeal of an order of the lower court granting appellees’ motion in limine to exclude admission of a document deemed by the lower court to be protected by the attorney/client privilege. Although the order is not appealable, we have elected to treat the notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari,1 which we deny. The lower court correctly concluded the document is privileged and appellees concede that the question of waiver of the privilege is subject to reconsideration by the lower court at trial if the [142]*142state can offer a proper predicate for admissibility on that ground.

PETITION DENIED.

THOMPSON, J., and RAINWATER, T.B., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Edwards, 622 So. 2d 141, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8197, 1993 WL 291796 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

622 So. 2d 141 (State v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Pettis
520 So. 2d 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)