State v. Edwards

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Edwards

622 So. 2d 141, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8197, 1993 WL 291796

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 6, 1993

DocketNo. 91-1972

StatusPublished

This text of 622 So. 2d 141 (State v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Edwards, 622 So. 2d 141, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8197, 1993 WL 291796 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

This matter comes to the court as an appeal of an order of the lower court granting appellees’ motion in limine to exclude admission of a document deemed by the lower court to be protected by the attorney/client privilege. Although the order is not appealable, we have elected to treat the notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari,¹ which we deny. The lower court correctly concluded the document is privileged and appellees concede that the question of waiver of the privilege is subject to reconsideration by the lower court at trial if the [142]*142state can offer a proper predicate for admissibility on that ground.

PETITION DENIED.

THOMPSON, J., and RAINWATER, T.B., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, Judge.

This matter comes to the court as an appeal of an order of the lower court granting appellees’ motion in limine to exclude admission of a document deemed by the lower court to be protected by the attorney/client privilege. Although the order is not appealable, we have elected to treat the notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari,¹ which we deny. The lower court correctly concluded the document is privileged and appellees concede that the question of waiver of the privilege is subject to reconsideration by the lower court at trial if the [142]*142state can offer a proper predicate for admissibility on that ground.

PETITION DENIED.

THOMPSON, J., and RAINWATER, T.B., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 So. 2d 141, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8197, 1993 WL 291796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-edwards-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack