State v. Edsall

269 N.E.2d 848, 26 Ohio St. 2d 145, 55 Ohio Op. 2d 276, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 503
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 19, 1971
DocketNo. 70-594
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 269 N.E.2d 848 (State v. Edsall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Edsall, 269 N.E.2d 848, 26 Ohio St. 2d 145, 55 Ohio Op. 2d 276, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 503 (Ohio 1971).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Habeas corpus tests only the jurisdiction of the sentencing court. In this ease, the J\ivenile [146]*146Court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the person of appellant. Accordingly, its original order of commitment, as well as its subsequent order of July 9, 1970, committing appellant to the detention home for 30 days, were valid and lawful orders by a court of competent jurisdiction. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Schneider, Herbert, Duncan, Corrigan, Stern and Leach, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Borden v. Hendon
2002 Ohio 3525 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 N.E.2d 848, 26 Ohio St. 2d 145, 55 Ohio Op. 2d 276, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-edsall-ohio-1971.