State v. Edsall
This text of 269 N.E.2d 848 (State v. Edsall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Habeas corpus tests only the jurisdiction of the sentencing court. In this ease, the J\ivenile [146]*146Court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the person of appellant. Accordingly, its original order of commitment, as well as its subsequent order of July 9, 1970, committing appellant to the detention home for 30 days, were valid and lawful orders by a court of competent jurisdiction. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 N.E.2d 848, 26 Ohio St. 2d 145, 55 Ohio Op. 2d 276, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-edsall-ohio-1971.