State v. Edmonson

735 N.E.2d 455, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1416, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2403
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Edmonson. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 Ohio St. 3d 324
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 20, 2000·No. 00-1438·Published

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 18061. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the following issue found at page 1 of the Order Certifying Record filed July 25, 2000:

“The rule of law upon which the conflict exists is whether in a prosecution of theft by deception of welfare benefits, is the value of property for R.C. 2913.02(B) purposes the total amount of the benefits received or only the amount of benefits as a result of the deception that would not have been received had truthful information been provided?”

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

The conflict case is State v. Luna (1994), 94 Ohio App.3d 653, 641 N.E.2d 747.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Edmonson, 735 N.E.2d 455, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1416, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2403 (Ohio 2000).

735 N.E.2d 455 (State v. Edmonson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Luna
641 N.E.2d 747 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)