State v. Edmons
156 N.W. 1086, 132 Minn. 465, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 819
Opinion
Defendant was convicted .of grand larceny, and appealed from an order denying a new trial. A careful consideration of the record leads to the conclusion that no errors were committed on the trial, the instructions to the jury are not open to criticism, but a majority of the court are of opinion that the evidence of the criminal intent is so far doubtful as to require in the interests of justice the submission of the question to another jury. We therefore reverse the order appealed from and remand the cause for a new trial.
Order reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Edmons, 156 N.W. 1086, 132 Minn. 465, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 819 (Mich. 1916).
156 N.W. 1086 (State v. Edmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Johnson
152 N.W.2d 529 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1967)
State v. Kemp
138 N.W.2d 610 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1965)
State v. Anderson
137 N.W.2d 781 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1965)
State v. Nyhus
222 N.W. 925 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1929)