State v. Edgerton
This text of State v. Edgerton (State v. Edgerton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 204A14
FILED 10 April 2015
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v. HOWARD JUNIOR EDGERTON
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of
the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 759 S.E.2d 669 (2014), vacating a judgment
entered on 21 March 2013 by Judge Gary M. Gavenus in Superior Court, Rutherford
County, and remanding for a new trial. Heard in the Supreme Court on 24 February
2015.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.
Michael E. Casterline for defendant-appellee.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of
Appeals is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration
of defendant’s remaining issues on appeal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Edgerton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-edgerton-nc-2015.