State v. Eddy

21 P.3d 1107, 173 Or. App. 442, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 485
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 4, 2001·No. 00M0025; CA A110717·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of an order of further mental commitment, asserting among other things that the trial court erred by failing to inform him of his rights under ORS 426.301. The state concedes that the trial court erred, and we agree. State v. Montgomery, 147 Or App 69, 934 P2d 640 (1997); see also State v. Allison, 129 Or App 47, 877 P2d 660 (1994).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Eddy, 21 P.3d 1107, 173 Or. App. 442, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 485 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

21 P.3d 1107 (State v. Eddy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Allison
877 P.2d 660 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)
State v. Montgomery
934 P.2d 640 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1997)