State v. Eckert

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Eckert

350 S.W.3d 487, 2011 WL 4916319

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 18, 2011

DocketWD 72055

StatusPublished

This text of 350 S.W.3d 487 (State v. Eckert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Eckert, 350 S.W.3d 487, 2011 WL 4916319 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Scott William Eckert was convicted, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of DeKalb County (“trial court”), of forcible rape, statutory rape in the first degree, tampering with physical evidence, and two counts of endangering the welfare of a child. He now appeals the trial court’s overruling of his objection to the State’s cross-examination about pornographic books and videos found in his house and the trial court’s admittance of the victim’s videotaped deposition. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Scott William Eckert was convicted, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of DeKalb County (“trial court”), of forcible rape, statutory rape in the first degree, tampering with physical evidence, and two counts of endangering the welfare of a child. He now appeals the trial court’s overruling of his objection to the State’s cross-examination about pornographic books and videos found in his house and the trial court’s admittance of the victim’s videotaped deposition. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

350 S.W.3d 487, 2011 WL 4916319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-eckert-moctapp-2011.