State v. Eckert
262 So. 3d 887
Opinion
Crichton, J., would grant and assigns reasons.
*888I would grant the defendant's writ application as it relates to the issue of the admissibility of the testimony of Matthew Larsen, for the reasons set forth in Judge Perret's dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Eckert, 262 So. 3d 887 (La. 2019).
262 So. 3d 887 (State v. Eckert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.