State v. Echols

32 S.W.3d 623, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1647, 2000 WL 1663685
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 7, 2000·No. No. WD 57928·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Echols appeals from his conviction for first-degree murder. In his sole point on appeal, Echols argues that because the court deleted a portion of his videotaped confession, the jury was unable to assess his mental state and thus he was denied his constitutional rights to due process and to present a defense. Affirmed, Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Echols, 32 S.W.3d 623, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1647, 2000 WL 1663685 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

32 S.W.3d 623 (State v. Echols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alan L. Echols v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2021
Alan Echols v. Mike Kemna
Eighth Circuit, 2007
Echols v. Kemna
511 F.3d 783 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
Echols v. State
168 S.W.3d 448 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)