State v. Echols
32 S.W.3d 623, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1647, 2000 WL 1663685
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 7, 2000
DocketNo. WD 57928
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 32 S.W.3d 623 (State v. Echols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Echols, 32 S.W.3d 623, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1647, 2000 WL 1663685 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant Echols appeals from his conviction for first-degree murder. In his sole point on appeal, Echols argues that because the court deleted a portion of his videotaped confession, the jury was unable to assess his mental state and thus he was denied his constitutional rights to due process and to present a defense. Affirmed, Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Alan L. Echols v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2021
Alan Echols v. Mike Kemna
Eighth Circuit, 2007
Echols v. Kemna
511 F.3d 783 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
Echols v. State
168 S.W.3d 448 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 S.W.3d 623, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1647, 2000 WL 1663685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-echols-moctapp-2000.