State v. Echemeque

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Echemeque

503 So. 2d 996, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 776, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12073

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 17, 1987

DocketNo. 86-2354

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 503 So. 2d 996 (State v. Echemeque) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Echemeque, 503 So. 2d 996, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 776, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12073 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of allowing it to enter a written statement explaining its reasons for departing below the sentencing guidelines in sentencing the defendant. Our relinquishment having expired, and no written order having been entered, the defendant’s sentence is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). We remind the trial court that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(11) requires that “[a]ny sentence outside of the guidelines must be accompanied by a written statement delineating the reasons for the departure.” We trust that should the trial court upon resentencing again depart from the guidelines, it will comply with the requirements of this rule.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of allowing it to enter a written statement explaining its reasons for departing below the sentencing guidelines in sentencing the defendant. Our relinquishment having expired, and no written order having been entered, the defendant’s sentence is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). We remind the trial court that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(11) requires that “[a]ny sentence outside of the guidelines must be accompanied by a written statement delineating the reasons for the departure.” We trust that should the trial court upon resentencing again depart from the guidelines, it will comply with the requirements of this rule.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

503 So. 2d 996, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 776, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-echemeque-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack