State v. Eberhardt

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Eberhardt

574 S.W.3d 827

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 14, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106708

StatusPublished

This text of 574 S.W.3d 827 (State v. Eberhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Eberhardt, 574 S.W.3d 827 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lena Michelle Eberhardt appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of fraudulently attempting to obtain a controlled substance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).¹

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lena Michelle Eberhardt appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of fraudulently attempting to obtain a controlled substance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).¹

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

574 S.W.3d 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-eberhardt-moctapp-2019.