State v. East

571 P.2d 195, 31 Or. App. 743, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2036
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 15, 1977·No. No. DA 136432, CA 8810·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from an order dismissing a complaint for "failure to state facts,” by which the district court apparently meant failure to allege sufficient facts to state a crime.

In addition to other requisite allegations, the complaint alleged that the defendants did "offer and agree to engage in sexual conduct in return for a fee.”

ORS 167.007(l)(a) provides that a person commits the crime of prostitution if he "offers or agrees to engage in sexual conduct * * * in return for a fee.”

It is elementary that an instrument which charges a crime in the statutory language is generally sufficient to charge a crime. State v. Jim/White, 13 Or App 201, 508 P2d 462 rev den (1973); State v. Miller, 11 Or App 398, 501 P2d 1309 rev den (1972).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. East, 571 P.2d 195, 31 Or. App. 743, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2036 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

571 P.2d 195 (State v. East) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Waldo
763 P.2d 417 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)
State v. Strandquist
644 P.2d 658 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)