State v. East

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. East

491 So. 2d 14, 1986 La. LEXIS 6842

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 1, 1986

DocketNo. 86-K-0811

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 491 So. 2d 14 (State v. East) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. East, 491 So. 2d 14, 1986 La. LEXIS 6842 (La. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In re East, Wade; applying for supervisory writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 85-KA-1333; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “J”, No. 10-84-148.

Prior report: La.App., 486 So.2d 902.

Granted. Defendant’s conviction is affirmed. The sentence is amended, however, to delete the restriction “without benefit of suspension of sentence, probation or parole.” When the state has not requested the enhancement, a trial court may not sentence the defendant under La.C.Cr.P. art. 893.1. See State v. Shows, 488 So.2d 992 (La.1986).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re East, Wade; applying for supervisory writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 85-KA-1333; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “J”, No. 10-84-148.

Prior report: La.App., 486 So.2d 902.

Granted. Defendant’s conviction is affirmed. The sentence is amended, however, to delete the restriction “without benefit of suspension of sentence, probation or parole.” When the state has not requested the enhancement, a trial court may not sentence the defendant under La.C.Cr.P. art. 893.1. See State v. Shows, 488 So.2d 992 (La.1986).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

491 So. 2d 14, 1986 La. LEXIS 6842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-east-la-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack