State v. Eason
501 So. 2d 696, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 414, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6527
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 1987·No. No. 86-87·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The state appeals from the trial court’s downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. The only reason given on the scoresheet for the departure was “Recommendation of D.O.C. [Department of Corrections] Officer.” The trial court’s own reason for departure should be set forth. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); State v. D’Alexander, 496 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). We reverse and remand for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Eason, 501 So. 2d 696, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 414, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6527 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
501 So. 2d 696 (State v. Eason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J.M. v. State
677 So. 2d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
State v. Zlockower
650 So. 2d 692 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Cahill v. State
505 So. 2d 1113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)