State v. Eason

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Eason

501 So. 2d 696, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 414, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6527

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 28, 1987

DocketNo. 86-87

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 501 So. 2d 696 (State v. Eason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Eason, 501 So. 2d 696, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 414, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6527 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from the trial court’s downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. The only reason given on the scoresheet for the departure was “Recommendation of D.O.C. [Department of Corrections] Officer.” The trial court’s own reason for departure should be set forth. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); State v. D’Alexander, 496 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). We reverse and remand for resentencing.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from the trial court’s downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. The only reason given on the scoresheet for the departure was “Recommendation of D.O.C. [Department of Corrections] Officer.” The trial court’s own reason for departure should be set forth. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); State v. D’Alexander, 496 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). We reverse and remand for resentencing.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

501 So. 2d 696, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 414, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-eason-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack