State v. . Earwood
75 N.C. 210
This text of 75 N.C. 210 (State v. . Earwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. . Earwood, 75 N.C. 210 (N.C. 1876).
Opinion
The declarations of one of the alleged conspirators, made in the absence of the others, after the transaction was over, (211) introduced by the State to prove the conspiracy, were clearly incompetent against any one except himself. There is error.
PER CURIAM. Venire de novo.
Cited: S. v. Jackson,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. . Jackson
82 N.C. 565 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1880)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
75 N.C. 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-earwood-nc-1876.